Positron emission tomography for urological tumours
S.F. Hain
The Clinical PET Centre, Guy's and St Thomas’ Hospital; King's College, London, UK
Search for more papers by this authorM.N. Maisey
The Clinical PET Centre, Guy's and St Thomas’ Hospital; King's College, London, UK
Search for more papers by this authorS.F. Hain
The Clinical PET Centre, Guy's and St Thomas’ Hospital; King's College, London, UK
Search for more papers by this authorM.N. Maisey
The Clinical PET Centre, Guy's and St Thomas’ Hospital; King's College, London, UK
Search for more papers by this authorSUMMARY
For urological tumours, positron emission tomography (PET) is currently most useful in testicular cancer. In patients with residual masses or raised marker levels after treatment, PET is both sensitive and specific for detecting recurrent disease, at suspected and unsuspected sites. Although fewer studies are available it also appears to be useful for staging at diagnosis, although this requires further investigation. Prostate cancer imaging has been more variable, with studies showing that PET cannot reliably differentiate between tumour and hypertrophy. It is not as good as a bone scan for defining bone metastases. In renal cancer, PET can be used to define the primary tumour, providing better staging of local recurrence than computed tomography (CT), and to define metastatic disease. There are few studies in bladder cancer, and despite excretion of the tracer via the bladder in early studies, it has better results than CT or magnetic resonance imaging for local staging; again it can detect metastases. Overall, the place of PET in urological tumours is developing, with the strongest areas undoubtedly being testicular and renal cancer. Tracers other than fluorodeoxyglucose are being examined and are providing further information.
REFERENCES
- 1 Saunders CA, Dussek JE, O'Doherty MJ, Maisey MN. Evaluation of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose whole body positron emission tomography imaging in the staging of lung cancer. Ann Thoracic Surg 1999; 67: 790–7
- 2 Mikhaeel NG, Timothy AR, Hain S, O'Doherty MJ, Maisey MN. 18-FDG-PET as a prognostic indicator in the treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Leukaemia Lymphoma 2000; 39: 543–53
- 3 Hain SF, O'Doherty MJ, Timothy AR et al. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the evaluation of germ cell tumours at relapse. Br J Cancer 2000; 83: 863–9
- 4 Effert PJ, Bares R, Handt S, Wolff JM, Bull U, Jakse G. Metabolic imaging of untreated prostate cancer by positron emission tomography with 18 fluorine–labelled deoxyglucose. J Urol 1996; 155: 994–8
- 5 Liu IJ, Zafar MB, Lai YH, Segall GM, Terris MK. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography studies in diagnosis and staging of clinically organ-confined prostate cancer. Urology 2001; 57: 108–11
- 6 Halfpenny W, Hain SF, Biassoni L, Maisey MN, Sherman JA, McGurk M. FDG-PET. A possible prognostic factor in head and neck cancer. Br J Cancer 2002; 86: 512–6
- 7 Oyama N, Akino H, Suzuki Y et al. The increased accumulation of [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose in untreated prostate cancer. Jap J Clin Oncol 1999; 29: 623–9
- 8 Heicappell R, Muller-Mattheis V, Reinhardt M et al. Staging of pelvic lymph nodes in neoplasms of the bladder and prostate by positron emission tomography with 2-[(18)]-2-deoxy-d-glucose. Eur Urol 1999; 36: 582–7
- 9 Sanz G, Robles JE, Gimenez M, Arcena J, Sanchez D, Rodriguez-Rubio F. Positron emission tomography with 18 fluorine-labelled deoxyglucose: utility in localized and advance prostate cancer. BJU Int 1999; 84: 1028–31
- 10 Shreve PD, Grossman HB, Gross MD, Wahl RL. Metastatic prostate cancer. initial findings of PET with 2-deoxy-[F-18] fluoro-d-glucose. Radiology 1996; 199: 751–6
- 11 Yeh SD, Imbriaco M, Larson SM et al. Detection of bony metastases of androgen-independent prostate cancer by FDG-PET. Nucl Med Biol 1996; 23: 693–7
- 12 Cook GJ, Houston S, Rubens R, Maisey MN, Fogelman I. Detection of bone metastases in breast cancer by 18FDG PET: differing metabolic activity in osteoblastic and osteolytic lesions. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 3375–9
- 13 Mikhaeel NG, Timothy AR, Hain SF, O'Doherty MJ. 18F FDG-PET for the assessment of residual masses on CT after treatment of lymphomas. Ann Oncol 2000; 11: S147–S150
- 14 Hofer C, Laubenbacher C, Block T, Breul J, Hartung R, Schwaiger M. Fluorine-18-fluorodeoyglucose positron emission tomography is useless for the detection of local recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 1999; 36: 31–5
- 15 Schelling M, Avril N, Nahrig J et al. Positron emission tomography using [(18)F] Fluorodeoxyglucose for monitoring primary chemotherapy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18: 1689–95
- 16 Oyama N, Akino H, Suzuki Y et al. FDG PET for evaluating the change of glucose metabolism in prostate cancer after androgen ablation. Nucl Med Comm 2001; 22: 963–9
- 17 Nunez R, Macapinlac HA, Yeung HW et al. Combined 18F-FDG and 11C-methionine PET scans in patients with newly progressive metastatic prostate cancer. J Nuclear Med 2002; 43: 46–55
- 18 Kotzerke J, Prang J, Neumaier B et al. Experience with carbon-11 choline positron emission tomography in prostate cancer. EJNM 2000; 27: 1415–9
- 19 Hara T, Kosaka N, Kishi H. PET imaging of prostate cancer using choline-11-choline. J Nucl Med 1998; 39: 990–5
- 20 DeGrado TR, Coleman RE, Wang S et al. Synthesis and evaluation of 18F-labelled choline as an oncological tracer for positron emission tomography: initial findings in prostate cancer. Cancer Res 2001; 61: 110–7
- 21 Oyama N, Akino H, Kanamaru H et al. 11C-acetate PET imaging of prostate cancer. J Nucl Med 2002; 43: 181–6
- 22 Bachor R, Kotzerke J, Gottfried HW, Brandle E, Reske SN, Hautmann R. Positron emission tomography in the diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma. Urologe 1996; 35: 146–50
- 23 Ramdave S, Thomas GW, Berlangiere SU et al. Clinical role of F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for detection and management of renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 2001; 166: 825–30
- 24 Miyakita H, Tokunaga M, Onda H et al. Significance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for detection of renal cell carcinoma and immunohistochemical glucose transporter 1 (GLUT-1) expression in the cancer. Int J Urol 2002; 9: 15–8
- 25 Goldberg MA, Mayo-Smith WW, Papanicolaou N, Fischmann AJ, Lee MJ. FDG PET characterization of renal masses: preliminary experience. Clin Radiol 1997; 52: 510–5
- 26 Hain SF, Gleadle J, Maisey MN. FDG-PET in the differentiation of thrombus and tumour in renal cell carcinoma. Clin Nucl Med 1999; 24: 819–20
- 27 Safaei A, Figlin R, Hoh CK et al. The usefulness of F-18 deoxyglucose whole-body positron emission tomography (PET) for re-staging of renal cell cancer. Clin Nephrol 2002; 57: 56–62
- 28 Seto E, Segall GM, Terris MK. Positron emission tomography detection of osseous metastases of renal cell carcinoma not identified on bone scan. Urology 2000; 55: 286
- 29 Poggi MM, Patronas N, Buttman JA, Hewitt SM, Fuller B. Intramedullary spinal cord metastases from renal cell carcinoma: detection by positron emission tomography. Clin Nucl Med 2001; 26: 837–9
- 30 Bachor R, Kotzerke J, Reske SN, Hautmann R. Lymph node staging of bladder neck carcinoma with positron emission tomography. Urologe 1999; 38: 46–50
- 31 Kosuda S, Kison PV, Greenough R, Grossman HB, Wahl RL. Preliminary assessment of fluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with bladder cancer. EJNM 1997; 24: 615–20
- 32 Ahlstrom H, Malmstrom PU, Letocha H, Andersson J, Langstrom B, Nilsson S. Positron emission tomography in the diagnosis and staging of urinary bladder cancer. Acta Radiol 1996; 37: 180–5
- 33 Stephens AW, Gonin R, Hutchins GD, Einhorn LH. Positron emission tomography of residual radiological abnormalities in postchemotherapy germ cell tumour patients. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14: 1637–41
- 34 Cremerius U, Effert PJ, Adam G et al. FDG PET for detection and therapy control of metastatic germ cell tumour. J Nucl Med 1998; 39: 815–22
- 35 Sugawara Y, Zasadny KR, Grossman HB et al. Germ cell tumour. differentiation of viable tumour, mature teratoma and necrotic tissue with FDG PET and kinetic modelling. Radiology 1999; 211: 249–56
- 36 De Santis M, Bokemeyer C, Becherer A et al. Predictive impact of 2–18fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography for residual postchemotherapy masses in patients with bulky seminoma. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 3740–4
- 37 Lodge MA, Lucas JD, Marsden PK et al. A PET study of 18FDG uptake in soft tissue masses. Eur J Nucl Med 1999; 26: 22–30
- 38 Bokmeyer C, Kollmannsberger C, Oechsle K et al. Early prediction of treatment response to high-dose salvage chemotherapy in patients with relapsed germ cell cancer using [(18)F] FDG PET. Br J Cancer 2002; 86: 506–11
- 39 Hain SF, O'Doherty MJ, Timothy A et al. Fluorodeoxyglucose PET in the initial staging of germ cell tumours. Eur J Nucl Med 2000; 27: 590–4
- 40 Warde P, Jewett MA. Surveillance for stage I testicular seminoma. Is it a good option? Urol Clin North Am 1998; 25: 425–33
- 41 Fernandez EB, Moul JW, Foley JP, Colon E, McLeod DG. Retroperitoneal imaging with third and fourth generation computed axial tomography in clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumours. Urology 1994; 44: 548–52
- 42 Cremerius U, Wildberger JE, Borchers H et al. Does positron emission tomography using 18-Fluoro-2-deoxyglucose improve clinical staging of testicular cancer? – results in 50 patients. Urology 1999; 54: 900–4
- 43 Albers P, Bender H, Yilmaz H et al. Positron emission tomography in the clinical staging of patients with stage I and II testicular germ cell tumours. Urology 1999; 53: 808–11