Volume 99, Issue 3 p. 587-594

Blood loss and postoperative complications associated with transurethral resection of the prostate after pretreatment with dutasteride

Robert G. Hahn

Robert G. Hahn

Departments of Anaesthesia and Urology, South Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden;

Search for more papers by this author
Tim Fagerström

Tim Fagerström

Departments of Anaesthesia and Urology, South Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden;

Search for more papers by this author
Teuvo L.J. Tammela

Teuvo L.J. Tammela

Urology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland;

Search for more papers by this author
Oncko Van Vierssen Trip

Oncko Van Vierssen Trip

Urology, Ziekenhuis Gelderse Vallei, Ede, the Netherlands;

Search for more papers by this author
Hans Olav Beisland

Hans Olav Beisland

Urology, Sorlandet Hospital, Arendal, Norway;

Search for more papers by this author
Annette Duggan

Annette Duggan

Clinical Development, GlaxoSmithKline, Greenford, UK and

Search for more papers by this author
Betsy Morrill

Betsy Morrill

Biostatistics, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 07 February 2007
Citations: 55
Robert G. Hahn, Department of Anaesthesia, Karolinska Institute, South Hospital, 118 83 Stockholm, Sweden.
e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

The relationship between 5α-reductase inhibitors and blood loss from the prostate has been well described and investigated previously. In a well-conducted study, authors from Sweden show that dutasteride, despite significantly lowering the tissue dihydrotestosterone levels, did not lower blood loss or transfusion rates after TURP.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether pretreatment with dutasteride, a dual 5α-reductase inhibitor (5ARI), reduces surgical blood loss or postoperative complications in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) who undergo transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicentre study comprised 214 patients with BPH. Placebo was compared with dutasteride 0.5 mg/day 2 weeks before and after TURP, or 4 weeks before and 2 weeks after TURP. Surgical blood loss was measured using a haemoglobin photometer (HemoCue AB, Ängelholm, Sweden) and postoperative adverse events were recorded. Microvessel density (MVD) was calculated by immunostaining and light microscopy of the prostatic chips.

RESULTS

Although dutasteride reduced serum dihydrotestosterone (DHT) by 86–89% in 2–4 weeks, and intraprostatic DHT was ≈ 10 times lower than in the placebo group, the (adjusted) mean haemoglobin (Hb) loss during surgery was 2.15–2.55 g Hb/g resectate with no significant difference in blood loss between the groups either during or after TURP. Clot retention occurred in 6–11% and urinary incontinence in 14–15% of patients during the 14 weeks after TURP, with no difference between the groups. The MVD at TURP was also similar for all groups.

CONCLUSION

There were no significant reductions in blood loss during or after TURP or complications afterward with dutasteride compared with placebo, despite significant suppression of intraprostatic DHT. Blood loss and transfusion rates in the placebo group were lower than those previously reported in studies where there was a beneficial effect of a 5ARI, relative to placebo, on bleeding during TURP.