Volume 106, Issue 8 p. 1143-1147

The prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3) urine test in men with previous negative biopsies: does free-to-total prostate-specific antigen ratio influence the performance of the PCA3 score in predicting positive biopsies?

Guillaume Ploussard

Guillaume Ploussard

Hôpital Henri Mondor, Crèteil, France, Department of Urology, and

Search for more papers by this author
Alexander Haese

Alexander Haese

Hôpital Henri Mondor, Crèteil, France, Department of Urology, and

Search for more papers by this author
Hendrik Van Poppel

Hendrik Van Poppel

Universitair Ziekenhuis Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium,

Search for more papers by this author
Michael Marberger

Michael Marberger

University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, and

Search for more papers by this author
Arnulf Stenzl

Arnulf Stenzl

Uniklinikum Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany,

Search for more papers by this author
Peter F.A. Mulders

Peter F.A. Mulders

Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Hartwig Huland

Hartwig Huland

Martini-Clinic Prostate Cancer Center, University Clinic Hamburg, Hamburg,

Search for more papers by this author
Laurence Bastien

Laurence Bastien

Hôpital Henri Mondor, Crèteil, France, Department of Urology, and

Search for more papers by this author
Clèment-Claude Abbou

Clèment-Claude Abbou

Hôpital Henri Mondor, Crèteil, France, Department of Urology, and

Search for more papers by this author
Mesut Remzi

Mesut Remzi

University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, and

Search for more papers by this author
Martina Tinzl

Martina Tinzl

University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, and

Search for more papers by this author
Susan Feyerabend

Susan Feyerabend

Uniklinikum Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany,

Search for more papers by this author
Alexander B. Stillebroer

Alexander B. Stillebroer

Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Martijn P.M.Q. Van Gils

Martijn P.M.Q. Van Gils

Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Jack A. Schalken

Jack A. Schalken

Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Alexandre De La Taille

Alexandre De La Taille

Hôpital Henri Mondor, Crèteil, France, Department of Urology, and

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 11 March 2010
Citations: 54
Alexandre de la Taille, INSERM U955 Eq07, Department of Urology, CHU Mondor, 51, avenue du Marèchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94000 Crèteil, France.
e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Study Type – Diagnosis (exploratory cohort)
Level of Evidence 2b

OBJECTIVE

To determine the performance characteristics of the prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3) score on the outcome of biopsy relative to different ranges of free-to-total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ratio (f/tPSA) in men with a previous negative biopsy and a PSA level of 2.5–10 ng/mL, as urine tests like PCA3 are currently under investigation in order to improve prostate cancer diagnosis and to decrease the rate of unnecessary rebiopsies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from the previous prospective European multicentre study were reviewed. Only patients with a PSA level of 2.5–10 ng/mL were included in the present study. In all, 301 patients had complete data. The diagnostic accuracy of the PCA3 score for predicting a positive biopsy outcome was studied using sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values. The PCA3 performance was evaluated relative to three different subgroups of f/tPSA, as follows: >20% (group 1), 10–20% (group 2) and <10% (group 3).

RESULTS

The prostate cancer detection rates were 18.8%, 23.9% and 34.8% in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the PCA3 score, total PSA and f/tPSA was 0.688, 0.553 and 0.571, respectively. The percentage of men with positive biopsies was 30.6%, 37.0% and 44.4% in those with a PCA3 score of >30, vs 10.3%, 15.5% and 28.6% when the PCA3 score was <30, in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The difference was significant only in groups 1 and 2. In men with a f/tPSA of ≤10% the difference in detection rates relative to the PCA3 score was not statistically significant regardless of which PCA3 threshold was used. A high PCA3 score was significantly associated with age, clinical T2 stage and positive biopsy (P < 0.001, 0.013 and <0.001, respectively). In bivariate analysis accounting for the PCA3 score and the f/tPSA, a PCA3 score of >30 was a significant independent predictor of positive biopsies (odds ratio 3.01; 95% confidence interval 1.74–5.23; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

PCA3 remained a better predictor of prostate cancer than f/tPSA. In men with a f/tPSA of >10%, the use of the PCA3 score was highly correlated with the risk of having cancer on re-biopsy, and could prevent unnecessary prostate biopsies if the value is low.