Volume 110, Issue 10 p. 1501-1506
Urological Oncology

Combined 18F-fluorocholine and 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging for staging of high-risk prostate cancer

Henrik Kjölhede

Corresponding Author

Henrik Kjölhede

Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, Växjö County Hospital, Lund University

Henrik Kjölhede, Department of Surgery, Växjö County Hospital, 351 85 Växjö, Sweden. e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Göran Ahlgren

Göran Ahlgren

Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University

Search for more papers by this author
Helen Almquist

Helen Almquist

Center for Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University

Search for more papers by this author
Fredrik Liedberg

Fredrik Liedberg

Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, Växjö County Hospital, Lund University

Search for more papers by this author
Kerstin Lyttkens

Kerstin Lyttkens

Center for Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University

Search for more papers by this author
Tomas Ohlsson

Tomas Ohlsson

Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University

Search for more papers by this author
Ola Bratt

Ola Bratt

Department of Urology, Helsingborg Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 13 April 2012
Citations: 60

Abstract

Study Type – Diagnosis (cohort)

Level of Evidence 2a

What's known on the subject? and What does the study add?

Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with choline and fluoride for the detection of metastases in patients with prostate cancer have each been evaluated, with mixed results. Choline PET/CT has been evaluated against pelvic lymphadenectomy, generally with a low sensitivity but a high specificity; however, the study populations have been heterogenous. Fluoride PET/CT has been evaluated against other imaging methods, such as bone scan, single photon emission CT and MRI, and has been shown to have high specificity as well as sensitivity for bone metastases, but there are no studies with biopsy verification.

This is the first study that evaluates the clinical use of both choline and fluoride PET/CT on the same patients in a well-defined population of patients with high-risk prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE

  • To investigate how often positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scans, with both 18F-fluorocholine and 18F-fluoride as markers, add clinically relevant information for patients with prostate cancer who have high-risk tumours and a normal or inconclusive planar bone scan.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

  • Patients with prostate cancer with prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels between 20 and 99 ng/mL and/or Gleason score 8–10 tumours, planned for treatment with curative intent based on routine staging with a negative or inconclusive bone scan, were further investigated with a 18F-fluorocholine and a 18F-fluoride PET/CT.

  • None of the patients received hormonal therapy before the staging procedures were completed.

RESULTS

  • For 50 of the 90 included patients (56%) one or both PET/CT scans indicated metastases.

  • 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT indicated lymph node metastases and/or bone metastases in 35 patients (39%).

  • 18F-fluoride PET/CT was suggestive for bone metastases in 37 patients (41%).

  • In 18 patients (20%) the PET/CT scans indicated widespread metastases, leading to a change in therapy intent from curative to non-curative.

  • Of the patients with positive scans, 74% had Gleason score 8–10 tumours. Of the patients with Gleason score 8–10 tumours, 64% had positive scans.

CONCLUSIONS

  • PET/CT scans with 18F-fluorocholine and 18F-fluoride commonly detect metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer and a negative or inconclusive bone scan.

  • For 20% of the patients the results of the PET/CT scans changed the treatment plan.